In the field of biology and medical science, there are many experiments done in order to advance the science and to create more ways to improve the current standard of living. However, the results of these experiments are not received equally and there are often clashes in opinion on if something is safe enough to be implemented into the real world or is too dangerous and should be kept in the labs.

One such controversy is the viral victor controversy which is about the validity of the concept that viruses can be used as a method to tackle the more dangerous diseases and illnesses like smallpox or HIV. This controversy paper sheds light on the benefits and risks associated with using viral victor and if it is even worth investigating further based on how effective the results of implementing it are.

Scientific Controversy Paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDVCCyiOGXdKyX4Cm17NwQ0wkKGVJNPhx-HYZWkGUk4/edit